Even as PLA has become a more regular feature of higher education; even as PLA and its myriad practices have been recognized as a legitimate way to acknowledge college-level learning regardless of the origins of that learning, the question of quality cannot disappear. Detractors have always questioned the academic viability of PLA, but even those of us who have championed its cause have to take responsibility for regularly grappling with the important issues of quality assurance and accountability that emerge in every aspect of our PLA work.
The second issue of PLAIO focuses on a range of issues, problems and questions concerning quality assurance and accountability.
- We encourage your feedback on our PLAIO articles. To view or post comments on individual pieces, please log in under the “User” box on the right or under the “Log In” tab above (where you can also create an account). Then, click on the article and view the comments, or select “Add Comment” to post your feedback. Thank you!
Table of Contents
Editorial
|
Quality and Legitimacy
Alan Mandell, Nan Travers
|
|
Invited Essays
Joy Van Kleef
|
|
Inquiry (Peer-Reviewed)
Michael Andersen, Christina Laugesen
|
|
Per Andersson, Andreas Fejes
|
|
David Starr-Glass
|
|
Ruth Whittaker, Julie Brown
|
|
Gretchen Wilbur, Catherine Marienau, Morry Fiddler
|
|
Interviews
|
A Second Chance for Qualification: An Interview with Patrick Werquin
Alan Mandell, Nan Travers
|
|
|
Breaking Barriers, Finding Alternatives: An Interview with Susan Simosko
Viktoria Popova-Gonci
|
|
Practice Today
Barbara Workman
|
|
Ask A Question
|
Applying CAEL Standard IX
Morry Fiddler, Gabrielle Dietzel
|
|
Resources
Madhu Singh
|
|
Nan Travers, Marnie Evans
|
|
PLIRC Research Database
Christine Wihak
|
|